“Pezeshkian has told close associates that he will dismiss Araghchi if such conduct continues,” said a source familiar with the situation, underscoring the growing tensions within Iran’s government. On May 1, 2026, Iranian leadership is in turmoil as efforts to remove Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi escalate amidst accusations of his alignment with the Revolutionary Guard. President Masoud Pezeshkian and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf are at the forefront of this push, expressing dissatisfaction with Araghchi’s handling of critical negotiations with the United States. They argue that he has acted more like an aide to Revolutionary Guard Commander Ahmad Vahidi than a cabinet minister, raising concerns about his loyalty. That context matters because it highlights deep divisions within Iran’s leadership regarding foreign policy. Ghalibaf recently resigned from his position as head of the negotiating team after being reprimanded for including discussions on Iran’s nuclear program, further complicating an already precarious situation. Araghchi’s recent actions have not helped his case. He traveled alone to Islamabad on April 24 to deliver Tehran’s proposal to Pakistani officials without informing Pezeshkian, which caused significant frustration among top officials. This move was seen as a direct challenge to their authority. Moreover, divisions are not just limited to leadership dynamics; they reflect broader sentiments within Iranian politics. A group of lawmakers aligned with hardline politician Saeed Jalili have openly refused to support the negotiating team, signaling a rift that could hinder future diplomatic efforts. The Revolutionary Guards are reportedly consolidating their power in key managerial positions due to this critical situation. This shift could impact regional stability and Iran-Russia relations as both countries navigate their interests amid uncertainty. Yet, it’s not all bleak for Araghchi. He recently stated that cooperation between Iran and Russia continues to expand despite regional uncertainty—a sentiment echoed by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who described a recent meeting as constructive and practical. Araghchi also asserted that the United States failed to achieve its objectives in the recent conflict with Iran. His remarks suggest a defiance against external pressures, but they may also alienate him further from those advocating for a more conciliatory approach. The internal struggle over Araghchi’s future raises questions about Iran’s direction in international negotiations. As factions vie for control and influence, clarity on leadership decisions remains elusive. No timeline has been shared regarding potential changes in leadership or policy direction, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high for both domestic stability and international relations. Post navigation What Does the Indian Reserve Bank’s CBDC-Based Digital Food Coupon Pilot Mean? Bhagwant mann: What Happened in the Punjab Assembly with ?